Christians and Fellow Heretics

Thursday, March 24, 2011

Soteriological Near-Universalism: Rob Bell Case preceded by Neal Punt Case in Christian Reformed Church



The blog-entry that follows comes out of my reflections and research on the Rob Bell Case, and my encouragement upon taking notice that reformational scholar Dr Richard Mouw has supported pastor Bell.  To understand Mouw's position better I had to go back to the Neal Punt Case which prepared me to take on Jan Bonda's work as well.  

By way of intro, please note that Dr Mouw tawt philosophy at Calvin College for manuy years. After taking admin positions as well, Mouw was appointed President of Fuller Theological Seminary and continued to write many good books.  Eventually, I hope to get to his book responding to John Piper's book, Desiring God.  The reply is Mouw's God Who Commands, becawz Piper wants to treat the imperatives regarding Joy in the Bible , especially the New Testament, as deontologicals floated up out of their Biblical contexts (Northrup Frye) . In that book, Mouw references "The idea of divine generosity, see Neal Punt, What's Good About the Good News, the Plan of Salvation in a New Light (Northland Books, pp. 87-92)." Mouw says further that his own book Calvinism in the Las Vegas Airport (Zondervan Books, 2004, p. 130) also advances this idea of divine  generosity. I have these for-me-new sources on the problem being addressed here. As I said in a draft for an email to some friends:<blockquote>Earlier in 1985, while Mouw was teaching philosophy at Calvin College (I believe), the Christian Reformed Church actually put a pastor on trial for heresy.  The Neal Punt case.  The charge of heresy was made by the Lethbridge, Alberta, Canada CRC -- very distant from where Punt was pastoring in the Chicago region CRC (this can be done in the CRC).  Here's the link from a website Neal Punt still maintains today in his retirement. He was exonerated by the Chicago classis (as presbyteries are known in the CRC).  Now, I disagree with Punt becawz I come to this question from the standpoint of the Interim State as the missiological foundation of a soteriological near-universalism (a stance close to but not necessarily identical to Punts own carefully-honed position which he calls "Evangelical Inclusivism."  Punt has used the phrase "biblical universalism" in at least a URL address; but I had had the impression that there was yet another website expressing a related stance on the problem at hand but different from Punt's and my own, a third option for a solution to ruffly the same problem.   





Read more »

Labels: , , , , , ,

Friday, March 18, 2011

Theology: Evangelical Fred Sanders dialogues with Karl Rahner



Frank Viola's Reimagining Church (Mar15,2k11) "Rediscovering  the Triune Nature of God" is a fine introduction to authentic ins+t into Trinity, an Intertestamental stance of some rabbis (according to Ephraim Urbach The Sages) and mature Christian theology.  Unfortunately, Viola is a fetishist of "organic church" which he considers the top-notch 'missional' stance*, but also is unimaginably a student of Fred Sanders (Biola University theologian in Los Angeles), the leading perichoretic trinitarian theologian in North America (even G.C. Berkouwer did not write a volume devoted to the trinit y doctrine in his Studies in Dogmatics) -- Sanders being  in turn a critical yet appreciative student of the best trinitarian thawt extant. He wrote his dissertation on the German Catholic liberal Jesuit Karl Rahner's immanentizing theory of Trinity.  These thinkers have developed and sustained the wonderful full-version of perichoresis, the perichoretic understanding of the Trinity.  This is the view of Trinity also taken by Jeremy Ive (Anglican pastor and theologian about to be PhD'd by King's College, London UK), in his dissertation on Christian philosophers Herman Dooyeweerd's and DHTh Vollenhoven's  Trinitarian commitments and understanding.  Ive is a reformational theologian and conflict-resolution analyst of international relations, who in that role takes what I regard as a stance of Christian political realism, not a simplistic pacificism, in our zigzag path to the all-dimensional Kingdom of God's peace, full-blown Shalom!  Unlike yodererists such as Shane Clairborne, who at least nevertheless

Read more »

Labels: , , , , , , ,

Thursday, March 10, 2011

Shifty contextualization in Southern Baptist missiology

Ed Stetzer's LifeWay Research Blog, (Mar7,2k11) presents a contribution from Dr David Sills affirmative yet critical of certain trends called loosely MissionSHIFT,  after the book and a conference of that name held July 12-15 at Ridgecrest Conference Center in North Carolina.

We can learn from Sills, too, but all in all he is just too biblistic for me.  He actually says below that "The Bible is the supracultural, concrete absolute, revealed will of God for the faith and practice of Christ's church in all times all over the world."  Sills believes the Bible is "supracultural" (an echo of "supernatural"; a doctrine that is itself not Biblical --altho I'm sure Sills can drum up some verses to further his hoary bad ideas).  He isn't honouring the hermeneutical principle of interpreting between two horizons, thus denying the Bible's own historicity, I woud say.  To diminish the Bible's historicity is to de-Incarnation-ize the character of its revelatory power, then and now.  A further consequence in this sillsian shift in how the Christian witness is contextualized (contextualization shift, mission shift, echoes of Thomas Kuhn's 'paradigm shift' in the Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 1962).


Editor : David Hesselgrave and Ed Stetzer 
Veteran missionary David Hesselgrave and rising missional expert Ed Stetzer edit this engaging set of conversational essays addressing global mission issues in the third millennium. Key contributors are Charles E. Van Engen (“Mission Described and Defined”), the late Paul Hiebert (“The Gospel in Human Contexts: Changing Perspectives on Contextualization”), and the late Ralph Winter (“The Future of Evangelicals in Mission”). Those offering written responses to these essays include: (Van Engen) Keith Eitel, Enoch Wan, Darrell Guder, Andreas J. Köstenberger; (Hiebert) Michael Pocock, Darrell Whiteman, Norman L. Geisler, Avery Willis; (Winter) Scott Moreau, Christopher Little, Michael Barnett, and Mark Terry. 

Read more »

Labels: , , , , , , ,

Tuesday, March 08, 2011

Robin Parry sets forth to slay the dragon of Calvinism (apparently without divesting himself of Scholasticism)

The clang of the bell triggers the boxers in their corners to arise from their stools and to move again to the center of the ring to encounter the fists of the ()ther.  Evangelical Universalists want cucumber sandwiches with their tea (I am desperately circumlocuting the phrase "tea party"), but in their ever so polite obsequies they are itching to jam a fistful of love into the eyes of the Calvinists, apparently not even knowing that there is old-school Calvinism and neo-Calvinism in the living stream from Abraham Kuyper and Herman Bavinck, for many thru Herman Dooyeweerd and DHTh Vollenhoven, to Hendrik Hart and James Olthuis, neo-calvinists who say "God is love."

What this reformational tradition says is that the Scholasticism of the Calvinist tradition entraps it in false dilemmas, which are its ruination if allowed to thrive.  Soteriological universalism and Rob Bell's concerns about our evangelical doctrines of death, heaven and hell -- regarding which he seeks a renewal and re-orientation theologically -- will only create permanent bipolarization among us, were we to fail to overcome the source in both universalism (salvation) and particularism (election) without coming communally to a clearer doctrine, philosophically rich,  of the Interim State between death and everlasting life in our lord Jesus Christ.

I have attempted to point to such a coherent and consistent appreciation of the Interim State in my previous posts on this blog regarding the Bell contretemps in which the Evangelical world especially has become embroiled.  Robin Parry may help us all to a clarity beyond the hereticizing pugilism into which we coud devolve.

-- Owlb

Read more »

Labels: , , , , , , , , , ,

Sunday, March 06, 2011

Heretization of pastor Rob Bell, Mars Hill Church, Grandville, Michigan, proceeds apace

Christians and Fellow Heretics Comment on  Christian Post article (Mar2,2k11)  -- I'll be writing some further reflections on this news report on the subject at hand.  See our earlier post, "Brother Justin lables brother Bell a heretic -- to hell with that!" (Feb27,2k11).  Please read that post which presents my own version of  'soteriological near-universalism.'  Among other things, it's impolrtant to make sure we don't confuse philosophical universalism -- like Thales' doctrine that all things are water (see Albert Wolters on DHTh Vollenhoven's problem-historical method in history of philosophy) -- with theological universalism in its Christian versions as it pertains to our set of doctrines in regard to salvation (soteriology), sin (hamartiology), hell (hellogy?), hades (OT), resurrection (OT--Daniel only, NT everywhere), election (NT see GC Berlkouwer's volume on Election and  one by an author named Botha on election, exegetically intense, especially on Romans (as I vaguely recall) translated from the Dutch original, published by Eerdmans (again, if memory serves me here, perhaps now out of print).   A commenter to the previous blog-entry on this theme offered further resources:  "have you read Gregory Boyd's book on trinitarian warfare theodicy (the problem of evil?) ... his last chapter is on the problem of Hell ... his resort is to C.S. Lewis and to Karl Barth, to explain a position that there is in fact Hell, but it is not the literal Hell we usually think is [that of which] the Bible speaks. It is nevertheless as Hellish as a lake of fire and brimstone, because it means being totally out of the Divine presence." Hat Tip to Romel!  -- Owlb



From:  Albert Wolters "On Vollenhoven's Problem-Historical Method" in


Hearing and Doing: Philosophical Essays Dedicated to H. Evan Runner 
edited by John Kraay and Anthony Tol. Wedge Publishing Foundation:
Toronto, 1979: 231-262

Problem of mythology and genesis
A. Mythologizing (theogono-cosmogenic)
B. Cosmogono-cosmological
C. Purely cosmological

Problem of dualism/monism
a. Dualism
b. Monism

Problem of universal/ individual

i. Universalism 
ii. Partial universalism 
iii. Individualism

Each intersection represents one basic type of conception. The one numbered “1,” for
instance, is the basic type of universalistic mythologizing dualism: it is represented,
according to Vollenhoven, by such disparate thinkers as Musaeus, Pythagoras,
Marcion, Manichaeism, the Cabala, and Sorel, to name only a few. 

A less esoteric basic type is that numbered “10”: [253] it represents the position of
materialists throughout the ages, from Thales and Democritus to Holbach and
Sartre.  © A M Wolters 24 of 35.


                  ----------------------------------------------------             








    Education

    |Wed, Mar. 02 2011 06:07 PM EDT

    Rob Bell Gets Evangelicals Talking 

    about Hell

    By Audrey Barrick|Christian Post Reporter    E-mail  Print  RSS

    An upcoming book by bestselling author and controversial preacher Rob Bell 

    has gotten a lot of evangelicals talking about hell. 

    Though his book, Love Wins: A Book About Heaven, Hell, and the Fate 
    of Every Person Who Ever Lived, is slated for release later this month, 
    a promotional video has already drawn claims of heresy.
    "Will only a few select 
    people make it to 
    heaven? ... And will 
    billions and billions of 
    people burn forever in 
    hell?" Bell, pastor of 
    Mars Hill Bible Church 
    in Grandville, Mich.
    poses in the video.

    "Millions and millions
    of people were taught
    that the primary
    message, the center of
    the gospel of Jesus, is
    that God is going to
    send you to hell unless
    you believe in Jesus.
    So what gets subtly
    sort of caught and
    taught is that Jesus rescues you from God. How could that God ever
    be good? ... And how could that ever be good news?"
    He states in the video that the good news is that "love wins."
    Justin Taylor, vice president of Editorial at Crossway, responded to the video, saying Bell has laid his cards on the table about universalism.
    "I think that the publisher’s description combined with Bell’s video is sufficient evidence to suggest that he thinks hell is empty and that God’s love (which desires all to be saved) is always successful," Taylor said.
    The publisher (HarperOne)'s description reads:
    "[I]n Love Wins: Heaven, Hell, and the Fate of Every Person Who Ever Lived, Bell addresses one of the most controversial issues of faith – the afterlife – arguing that a loving God would never sentence human souls to eternal suffering. With searing insight, Bell puts hell on trial, and his message is decidedly optimistic – eternal life doesn’t start when we die; it starts right now. And ultimately, Love Wins."
    Taylor contended, "If Bell is teaching that hell is empty and that you can reject Jesus and still be saved, he is opposing the gospel and the biblical teaching of Jesus Christ."
    Taylor is just one of many evangelicals who have weighed in on the upcoming book.
    Gaithersburg, Md., pastor Joshua Harris tweeted that Bell was preaching a false gospel. Though the book is not out yet and he has yet to read it, he stressed that Bell's statements in the video alone are "concerning enough to be challenged."
    While concerns that a popular pastor like Bell could be leading a lot of Christians in the wrong direction continue to pour out on the Internet, the debate has also prompted pastors to address the topic of hell.
    "Hell," Harris stated, "is what our sin deserves."
    "Hell is what God in his love has rescued us from. And we are not rescued from hell by our merit or the rightness of our doctrine. We are rescued from God's wrath by the self-giving love and sacrifice of Jesus on the cross."
    But he added, "[T]here should be no glee or triumph in our tone in seeking to proving this biblical doctrine. Our hearts should break for the lost and for our own coldness of heart towards their spiritual condition."
    The conversation that's being had should lead Christians to redouble their prayers and evangelistic efforts, Harris stressed.
    Also joining the discussion, East Lansing, Mich., pastor Kevin DeYoung reminded the public of why God's wrath is necessary.
    "We need God's wrath to keep us honest about evangelism," he said. "We need God's wrath in order to: forgive our enemiesrisk our lives for Jesus’ sake; live holy lives; understand what mercy means; grasp how wonderful heaven will be; be motivated to care for our impoverished brothers and sisters; and be ready for the Lord’s return."
    "Believing in God’s judgment actually helps us look more like Jesus. In short, we need the doctrine of the wrath of God."

    Labels: , , , ,

    Friday, March 04, 2011

    ReligiousAssassination: Pakistan: Schools close for a day honouring Christian in cabinet, Shabaz Bhatti, RIP

    Bangalore, India (ENInews) -- Christian schools and colleges across Pakistan on 3 March began shutting down for three days to protest the 2 March assassination in Islamabad of Shahbaz Bhatti, a Roman Catholic who was Minister for Religious Minorities, according toEcumenical News International (WCC).

    The event echoes what the later-sainted Paul did to St Stephen.  St Paul preached up the stoning of the first Christian martyr in Paul's act of religious assassination that is ignored when Christian ethicists discuss the homophobic passage in Romans chapter 1, which supplies the basis of homophobia among most Christians, a chapter in an epistle written by the same religious fanatic who earlier resorted to religious murder if the Book of Acts, by St Luke, is true and correct.  Paul's action, when he was still called Saul (of Tarsus), was not a result of his Judaism as such (but it brawt Judaism and Jews into disrepute); rather the religious assassination occurred in the first place becawz Paul had a psychic disorder of murderous rage that shows up again in the Romans 1 passage mentioned.  But you don't see any Christian schools, colleges, or churches shutting down to commiserate with St Stephen and today's homos vilified by the otherwise good St Paul.  The Pope of Rome coud initiate such an observance.  Shabaz Bhatti was a Roman Catholic.


    I find the discussion of Stephen that we find in the the Book of Acts,  a discussion I cite from a Roman Catholic source, is horribly inadequate and erroneous in some points as they are understood in Protestant scholarship.

    -- posted by Owlb

    Labels: , , , , , , ,